Integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación TIC en la Educación Superior Impacto en el Rendimiento Académico

José Manuel  Matute Guerrido; Irving Gabriel  Matute Pin

Autores/as

José Manuel Matute Guerrido Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Ecuador Autor/a https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9049-8696
Irving Gabriel Matute Pin Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Ecuador Autor/a https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4153-5722

Palabras clave:

educación superior, rendimiento académico, TIC, transformación digital, enseñanza universitaria

Resumen

La presente revisión literaria tiene como objetivo analizar el impacto de la integración de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC) en el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes universitarios. A raíz de la transformación digital acelerada por la pandemia, las universidades han incorporado diversas plataformas tecnológicas en sus modelos educativos, sin que exista todavía un consenso claro sobre su efectividad en términos de desempeño académico. Se revisaron investigaciones recientes publicadas en revistas indexadas de acceso abierto, abarcando estudios nacionales e internacionales. Los hallazgos indican que el uso estratégico de las TIC puede mejorar la motivación, la retención del conocimiento y el compromiso estudiantil, especialmente cuando se integra de forma coherente con la planificación pedagógica. Sin embargo, también se evidencian limitaciones como la brecha digital, la sobrecarga cognitiva y la falta de formación docente. Se concluye que el impacto de las TIC no es uniforme y depende de múltiples factores institucionales, disciplinares y personales. Finalmente, se proponen recomendaciones para una implementación más efectiva de estas tecnologías en la educación superior, con énfasis en la capacitación docente, la equidad digital y la evaluación continua del proceso de innovación educativa

Referencias

Areepattamannil, S., & Santos, R. M. (2019). Students’ autonomy and competence in ICT use: Associations with academic performance. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12132-6

Basri, S. (2018). ICT adoption impact on students’ academic performance: Evidence from Saudi universities. Education Research International, 2018, Article 1240197. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1240197

Bayraktar, S. (2006). A meta‑analysis of the effectiveness of computer technology use in second/foreign language learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 191–216.

Ben Youssef, A., & Dahmani, M. (2008). The impact of ICT on student performance in higher education: Direct effects, indirect effects and organisational change. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 5(1), 45–56.

Bulut, O., & Cutumisu, M. (2015). Investigation of the ICT use–achievement relationship: Evidence from Finnish and Turkish PISA data. Large‑Scale Assessments in Education, 3, 6.

Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K‑12 classrooms: A meta‑analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113.

Clark, K. M., & Lee, Y. T. (2019). Learner autonomy and digital competence: Impact on academic success. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12132-6

MDPI. (2022). ICT use, digital skills and students’ academic performance: Exploring the digital divide. Information, 13(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129

OECD (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection.

Pérez‑Juárez, M. A., González‑Ortega, D., & Aguiar‑Pérez, J. M. (2024). Digital distractions from the point of view of higher education students.

Petko, D., Cantieni, A., & Prasse, D. (2017). The influence of ICT use and related attitudes on students’ math and science performance: Multilevel analyses of the last decade’s PISA surveys. Large-Scale Assessments in Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00128-6

Skryabin, M., Edelsbrunner, P., Fisser, P., & Krull, G. (2015). Impact of ICT on students’ achievement: Cross‑national evidence from PISA. Education and Information Technologies.

Torgerson, C., & Zhu, D. (2015). A meta‑analysis of the effectiveness of ICT in higher education. Computers & Education, 81, 1–9.

Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2011). ICT in education: A comparison of PISA 2003 and PISA 2009. Journal of Education Policy, 26(2), 121–142.

OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection.

Cha, H., Park, T., & Seo, J. (2020). What should be considered when developing ICT-integrated classroom models for a developing country? Sustainability, 12(7), 2967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072967

García‑Gutiérrez, J., Ruiz‑Corbella, M., & Manjarrés Riesco, Á. (2021). Virtual service‑learning in higher education: A theoretical framework for enhancing its development. Frontiers in Education, 5, 630804. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.630804

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). Routledge. (Desarrolladores del modelo TPACK)

Nardi, B. A. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press.

Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technological innovation. Lexington Books. (TOE framework)

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428

Zeng, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2022). The relationship between teachers' information technology integration self‑efficacy and TPACK: A meta‑analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1091017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1091017

Alrasheedi, M., & Capretz, L. F. (2018). Determination of critical success factors affecting mobile learning: A meta-analysis approach. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04288

Gómez‑Tejedor, J. A., Vidaurre, A., Tort‑Ausina, I., et al. (2020). A systematic review of ICTs on student motivation in higher education institutions. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2024-0129

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C. et al. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLOS Medicine.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

García‑Gutiérrez, J., Ruiz‑Corbella, M., & Manjarrés Riesco, Á. (2021). Virtual service‑learning in higher education: A theoretical framework for enhancing its development. Frontiers in Education, 5, 630804. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.630804

Aleixandre‑Benavent, R., et al. (2023). Use and adoption of ICTs oriented to university student learning: Systematic review using PRISMA methodology. Cogent Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2288490

Álvarez, I., & Hernández, E. (2019). Systematic Review of Good Teaching Practices with ICT in Spanish Higher Education. Sustainability, 11(24), 7150. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247150

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley.

Pati, D., & Lorusso, M. (2017). A step‑by‑step approach to systematic reviews in educational research. Research in Education, 98(1), 12–34.

Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (Eds.). (2020). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI.

Cooper, H. (2019). Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta‑Analysis (2nd ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.

Alrasheedi, M., & Capretz, L. F. (2015). A meta-analysis of critical success factors affecting mobile learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.52.2.e

Awedh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2015). Using Socrative and smartphones for the support of collaborative learning. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01276

Basri, W. S. (2018). Examining the impact of organizational culture on the integration of ICT in Saudi universities. Education Research International, 2018, Article ID 1240197. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1240197

Courtney, L., Prendergast, M., O’Meara, N., & Cheevers, C. (2022). Exploring the relationship between students' use of ICT at home and their performance in mathematics across 19 countries. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00128-6

Dakka, S. M. (2015). Using Socrative to enhance in-class student engagement and collaboration. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02500

D. & Santos, A. (2022). Analysis of digital competencies and academic performance in higher education: An empirical study. Information, 13(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129

Fayda-Kinik, B. (2025). Students’ use of ICT at home and school: Its impact on academic achievement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13070

Frontiers in Education. (2022). The role of ICT in improving academic achievement: Evidence from international assessments. Frontiers in Education, 7, 916502. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.916502

Frontiers in Education. (2024). ICT-based mathematics learning and its effect on preservice teachers. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1401188. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1401188

Guerrero, J. A., Sánchez, D. M., & Martínez, A. R. (2024). Promoviendo el aprendizaje activo en ingeniería mediante Socrative y dispositivos móviles. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03820