PEER REVIEW POLICY

Innovarium International Journal, published by Sapiens Ediciones, follows a rigorous and transparent peer-review process designed to ensure the academic quality, originality, and impact of the articles it publishes. This evaluation is conducted through a double-blind review system, in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, ensuring an objective and impartial assessment of submitted manuscripts.

Phase 1: Initial Editorial Review

The process begins with an initial assessment by the editorial team of Innovarium International Journal. Authors will receive notification via email within a maximum of 72 hours, including a unique reference number. During this phase, the Editor-in-Chief or an assigned editor evaluates the manuscript’s alignment with the journal’s scope, its originality, academic relevance, and potential contribution to the field.

Manuscripts may be rejected at this stage if they fail to meet the journal’s criteria, have structural deficiencies, unclear findings, or contain plagiarized content. Authors will be informed promptly in such cases. If there are uncertainties, the Editorial Board will be consulted for additional review. Manuscripts passing this stage proceed to peer review.

Phase 2: Double-Blind Peer Review

Manuscripts that pass the initial review are sent for detailed evaluation by subject matter experts under a double-blind peer review process, ensuring anonymity for both authors and reviewers. Each reviewer assesses the manuscript based on several criteria:

  • Relevance and potential impact on the academic community.

  • Clarity and coherence of writing.

  • Theoretical rigor and logical structure of content.

  • Appropriate and up-to-date use of bibliographic sources.

  • Methodological soundness and validity of research design.

  • Depth and consistency of analysis.

  • Originality and significance of conclusions.

Reviewers have up to 30 days to complete their evaluations. Upon completion, authors receive the editorial decision. If revisions are required, authors will have between 8 and 15 days to submit their modifications, depending on the extent of the requested changes.

Phase 3: Editorial Quality Control

Once peer review is complete, manuscripts undergo editorial quality control. This includes a thorough check for grammar, spelling, and adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines. It also involves verifying that the content aligns with the journal’s aims and editorial policy.

It is important to note that successful completion of this process does not guarantee immediate publication, as the final decision depends on editorial priorities, publication schedules, and the overall impact within the academic field.

Total Editorial Process Timeframe

The full editorial process at Innovarium International Journal typically takes between 8 and 12 weeks, encompassing the initial review, peer review, editorial quality checks, and final decision. This timeframe may vary based on manuscript complexity and reviewer availability.

Roles and Confidentiality in the Review Process

Role of the Academic Editor: The Academic Editor oversees the entire evaluation process, ensuring manuscripts receive thorough review to maintain quality and rigor. Reviewers are expected to submit their reports within 8 days of assignment. Authors will be informed if there are delays.

Reviewer Confidentiality: Reviewer identities remain confidential throughout the process unless they choose to disclose them.

Number of Reviewers: Manuscripts are typically reviewed by at least two experts. Additional reviewers may be assigned if deemed necessary by the Academic Editor.

Final Editorial Decision

After receiving peer reviews, the Academic Editor makes the final decision on publication based on reviewer feedback and their technical judgment. This decision is communicated to authors through the editorial system and email.

Possible outcomes include:

  • Acceptance without changes: The article is approved for publication as is.

  • Minor revision: Small adjustments are required before final acceptance.

  • Major revision: Significant changes are necessary, requiring re-evaluation.

  • Rejection: The manuscript does not meet the journal’s standards.

This process ensures that Innovarium International Journal, under Sapiens Ediciones, maintains high scientific and academic standards by publishing impactful and relevant scholarly work.